Stop paying developers $15,000 for an MVP. Build it yourself in 24 hours. No code experience needed.
Vibe coding tools changed everything. Prompt → App. That simple.
But which tool actually works? I tested 15 platforms. Built real products. Lost money on some. Made money on others.
Here’s the definitive tier list. What to use. What to avoid. Whether you’re technical or not.
Before we rank tools, let’s define this.
Vibe coding: Describe what you want → AI builds it → You iterate → Ship product.
Not traditional coding:
The promise: Anyone can build software. Ideas matter more than technical skills.
Sam Altman said: “This is the era of the idea guy.”
He’s right. 2025 is the year non-technical founders win.
Here’s how they rank:
The ultimate vibe coding platform for 2025.
Why it’s #1:
Multi-Model Intelligence:
Full-Stack Power:
Smart Features:
Perfect for:
Pricing: ~$30/month
Real results: Users building production apps in 3-4 hours. Raised funding with MGX Dev prototypes. Actual revenue-generating products.
Why above others: Most complete solution. Doesn’t sacrifice power for simplicity. Handles complexity you didn’t know you needed.
The developer’s choice.
Why S Tier:
Pros:
Cons:
Technical spectrum: Very high
Who should use:
Model: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (best coding model)
Pricing: $20/month
Community advantage: Like React vs other frameworks. Community = tutorials, solutions, packages, support.
Real talk: If you can code even a little, this is your tool. If you’re completely non-technical, start elsewhere.
Best for non-technical vibe coders.
Why A Tier:
Pros:
Cons:
Technical spectrum: Low (non-technical friendly)
Real test: Built wedding RSVP site. Other tools failed. VZero shipped.
Why it beats competitors:
Perfect for:
Pricing: ~$20/month
Most improved award winner.
Why A Tier:
History:
Pros:
Cons:
Technical spectrum: Medium
Don’t bet against: Sam Altman has infinite resources. This will only get better.
Use case: You want cutting-edge AI. Willing to deal with occasional rough edges. Believe in OpenAI’s vision.
Pricing: $20/month (ChatGPT Plus)
The dark horse.
Why A Tier:
Unique features:
Pros:
Cons:
Technical spectrum: Medium
Who uses it: Not many people talk about it. But those who do? Love it.
Best for:
Pricing: ~$20/month
The VC darling.
Why B Tier:
The hype:
Reality:
Pros:
Cons:
Technical spectrum: Low
Real talk: Great for getting started. Outgrow it quickly if serious.
Best for:
Pricing: ~$30/month
Lovable’s twin.
Why B Tier:
Same tier as Lovable. Similar capabilities.
Pros:
Cons:
Technical spectrum: Low-Medium
Use case: Quick prototypes. Testing concepts. Not production apps.
Pricing: ~$25/month
Mobile app vibe coding.
Why B Tier:
Focus: Mobile apps (iOS/Android)
Built on: Expo (React Native)
Pros:
Cons:
Technical spectrum: Medium
The mobile opportunity:
Cal.ai makes millions monthly. Simple AI app. Mobile-first.
Everyone’s building mobile now. TikTok as search engine. App store discovery. Push notifications.
Best for:
Pricing: ~$20/month
Another mobile contender.
Why B Tier:
Positioning: “Lovable for mobile apps”
Pros:
Cons:
Technical spectrum: Low-Medium
Watch this space: Riley ships. Platform will improve fast.
Third mobile option.
Why B Tier:
Another mobile vibe coder.
Limited testing. Seems solid. B tier until proven otherwise.
Fourth mobile option.
Why B Tier:
Built by known builder. Mobile focus. Expo-based. Promising.
Mobile vibe coding consensus:
Pick based on:
The fallen king.
Why C Tier (used to be S+):
What happened:
The issue: It’s not the model. It’s the agent.
Agent = tools that let AI:
Cursor’s agent > Claude Code’s agent
Still viable: Yes. Just not dominant anymore.
Expect: Tug of war. Claude Code improves. Cursor improves. Back and forth.
Technical spectrum: High
Current recommendation: Use Cursor instead. Same model. Better results.
The showcase project.
Why C Tier:
Purpose: Not built to compete. Built to show Convex backend integration.
Quality: Actually good. 1-2 people built it. Impressive.
Limitations:
What it proved: Many new vibe coding tools now use Convex backend. Mission accomplished.
Technical spectrum: Medium
Should you use it: If learning. If curious about Convex. Not for real projects.
Open source: Fork it. Build your own vibe coder.
Mentioned but not tested: OpenCode (by Dax): Developers praise it. Haven’t tested personally.
The cautionary tale.
Why D Tier:
Not about tech: Technology is actually good. Team is talented.
The problem: Founder left. Devin acquired. Trust shattered.
As a founder: You’re betting on a team. If founder quits, what does that say?
Investor perspective: Would you invest in company where founder bounced?
User perspective: Will they maintain it? Will features continue? Is this abandonware?
Technical quality: A-B (if judged on merit alone)
Trust factor: F
Business decision: D tier
Recommendation: Don’t start new projects here. Too much uncertainty.
Exception: Already deep in Windsurf? Finish project. Then migrate.
Here’s where each tool falls:
You need:
You need:
You need:
From someone who’s seen it all:
Reality check:
You will not build production software in 5 prompts.
Stop the audacity.
Software is hard. Even with AI. Even with vibe coding.
You need:
Software is art. Respect the process.
First version breaks? Normal.
Second version has bugs? Expected.
Third version closer? Progress.
Welcome to software development.
Developers deal with this daily. AI tools help. Don’t eliminate difficulty.
Before coding:
Brainstorm with ChatGPT:
Cursor’s Plan Mode: Creates roadmap before building. Saves time. Prevents errors.
Document everything: Requirements. Features. Decisions. Changes.
Each error = experience
Track what works:
Build knowledge base.
Don’t build:
Start with:
Scale after success.
Where to learn:
Steal workflows.
Critical advice:
Follow founders of these tools:
Why?
You’re betting on people.
If you connect with Sam Altman’s vision → Use Codex If you trust Guillermo’s execution → Use VZero If you believe in Amjad → Use Replit
Founder quality matters.
Don’t get Windsurfed.
Realistic timelines:
Landing page: 2-4 hours Simple web app: 1-2 days CRUD app with auth: 3-5 days Complex SaaS: 2-4 weeks Production-ready: +2-4 weeks testing
Not 5 prompts.
Costs:
Total: $50-100/month minimum
Plus your time.
Built something that works? 🎉
Someone used your app? 🚀
Made first $1? 💰
These are HUGE wins.
Non-technical person building software? That’s incredible.
From a developer’s perspective:
Period.
If you can code, these are your tools.
Cursor for:
MGX Dev for:
You’re still steering.
AI suggests. You decide.
Don’t blindly accept:
Understand what’s happening:
Model (Claude/GPT) ≠ Full tool
Tool = Model + Agent
Agent provides:
Cursor’s agent > Claude Code’s agent (using same model)
That’s why results differ.
Better prompts = better code.
Include:
Create prompt library.
Use Git.
AI makes mistakes. You need rollback.
Commit frequently:
Never deploy untested.
Check:
AI doesn’t think about security.
Don’t become dependent.
What if:
Read AI-generated code. Learn from it.
Complex architecture? Cursor
Quick prototype? VZero
Mobile app? Rourke/Vibe Code
Learning? Replit
Mix and match.
Models improve weekly.
Follow:
Switch when better option emerges.
Found workflow? Share it.
Solved problem? Write tutorial.
Built something cool? Show process.
Community benefits everyone.
Why everyone’s building mobile now:
Making millions monthly.
Simple app:
But mobile-first.
People search TikTok.
They see app ads:
Featured sections. Search rankings. Category browsing.
Distribution built-in.
In-app purchases. Subscriptions. Premium features.
People pay more for apps than websites.
Expo changed everything.
One codebase:
AI can now build mobile apps.
Tools emerging:
2025 = Year of mobile vibe coding.
Problem: Tool doesn’t work first try → Switch immediately
Solution: Give each tool 3-5 real attempts. Learn its strengths.
Problem: First output should be production-ready
Solution: Treat output as draft. Refine. Iterate.
Problem: Jump straight to coding
Solution: Plan first. Prompt with detail. Save time.
Problem: Forgot how you built something
Solution: Document prompts, decisions, changes.
Problem: AI said it, must be right
Solution: Verify. Test. Check security.
Problem: Start with complex SaaS
Solution: MVP first. Prove concept. Then scale.
Problem: Build without market research
Solution: Validate idea before building.
Problem: Try to figure everything out alone
Solution: Learn from others. Ask questions. Share struggles.
Problem: Use Cursor as complete beginner
Solution: Match tool to skill level.
Problem: Quit after first failure
Solution: Persist. Every builder faces obstacles.
What’s coming:
GPT-5 launching soon. Claude 4 improving. Gemini 3 in development.
Each iteration = better code generation.
Industry-specific platforms:
Vertical focus = better results.
Talk to build.
No typing. Just describe. AI builds.
Already happening in some tools.
Multiple people vibe coding together.
Like Google Docs for building apps.
One-click:
Vercel already doing this.
Tools will integrate:
Complete business platform.
Automated:
Before you deploy.
Visual builders meet AI prompting.
Best of both:
One prompt:
True “write once, deploy everywhere.”
AI learns your:
Custom assistant for you.
Builder: Developer testing tools Tool: VZero Time: 4 hours Cost: $0 (trial period)
Outcome: Perfect working site. Other tools failed.
Lesson: Simple projects = perfect testing ground.
Builder: Non-technical founder Tool: Rourke Time: 2 weeks Cost: $20 tool + $50 API
Outcome: 1,000 downloads first month. $99 MRR.
Lesson: Start small. Solve real problem.
Builder: Technical founder Tool: Cursor Time: 3 weeks
Cost: $20/month
Outcome: Raised $100K pre-seed on prototype.
Lesson: Vibe coding legitimate for fundraising.
Builder: Agency owner Tool: MGX Dev Time: 1 week Cost: $30/month
Outcome: Internal tool saving 20 hours/week.
Lesson: Productivity tools = massive ROI.
Start: VZero Budget: $20/month Timeline: 1-2 weeks to first project
Start: MGX Dev or Codex Budget: $30-40/month Timeline: 3-5 days to first project
Start: Cursor Budget: $20/month Timeline: Same day to productivity
Start: Rourke or Vibe Code Budget: $20/month Timeline: 1 week to first app
Start: MGX Dev or Cursor Budget: $30-50/month per person Timeline: 2-3 days onboarding
MGX Dev: 10/10 (Complete solution)
Cursor: 9.5/10 (Best for developers)
VZero: 9/10 (Best for beginners)
Codex: 8.5/10 (Most improved, huge potential)
Replit: 8.5/10 (Underrated dark horse)
Lovable: 7.5/10 (Good not great)
Bolt: 7.5/10 (Same as Lovable)
Mobile Tools: 7/10 (Promising but new)
Claude Code: 7/10 (Fallen from grace)
Chef: 6/10 (Proof of concept)
Windsurf: 5/10 (Tech good, trust broken)
2025 is the year non-technical founders can actually build.
The tools exist. The technology works. The community supports.
What’s needed:
Pick your tool based on:
My top picks:
Don’t overthink it.
Pick one. Build something. Ship it.
The era of the idea guy is here.
Are you ready?
Three weeks ago, I sat down to plan our Christmas photos. I opened Pinterest. Saw…
Last New Year's Eve, I hired a photographer for our party. $350 for three hours.…
Two weeks after my daughter Emma was born, I got a text from a newborn…
Every Thanksgiving, the same thing happens. Someone says "Let's take a family photo!" We all…
Six months ago, a recruiter told me something that stung: "Your LinkedIn photo looks like…
Four months ago, my Instagram was depressing. I'd post a photo. Get 23 likes. Maybe…
This website uses cookies.